google-site-verification: google4283fb30fde0af74.html
top of page


Jonathan Haidt

The Righteous MInd

The Righteous MInd

Part I:  Description

Why We Disagree: Unveiling the Moral Roots of Politics with "The Righteous Mind"

The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion by Jonathan Haidt explores the surprising psychology behind our moral judgments and political stances.

Haidt argues that our moral intuitions, not cold reason, are the primary drivers of our ethical and political beliefs. He proposes five fundamental moral foundations, a kind of "moral taste buds" that shape how we view the world:

  • Care: Empathy, compassion, and protecting the vulnerable.

  • Fairness: Justice, reciprocity, and ensuring everyone gets what they deserve.

  • Loyalty: Group cohesion, in-group preference, and standing by your team.

  • Authority: Respect for tradition, hierarchy, and following the rules.

  • Sanctity: Purity, avoiding disgust, and respecting the sacred.

The Book's Core Insight:

People often prioritize different moral foundations, leading to seemingly irreconcilable stances on social and political issues. Liberals tend to emphasize Care and Fairness, while conservatives value all five foundations, often with a stronger focus on Loyalty, Authority, and Sanctity.

Understanding, Not Conversion:

Haidt doesn't advocate for everyone to adopt the same moral values. Instead, he emphasizes the importance of understanding these different foundations to foster better communication and bridge the political divide.

The Righteous Mind's Impact:

This book offers a fresh perspective on political polarization, challenging the idea that it's solely driven by ignorance or malice. By recognizing the role of moral intuitions, we can find ways to have more productive conversations across the political spectrum.

Disclosure: The Nexus Initiative LLC participates in the Amazon Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program that earns us referral fees by advertising and linking to without any extra cost to you. By purchasing through us, you help us to able to continue to offer complimentary, highly curated content such as this listing. We thank you for your support.

Part II:  Common Questions

1. Does this book claim that conservatives are morally superior to liberals?

  • Answer: No, Haidt emphasizes that all five moral foundations are valid, and present in everyone to varying degrees. His point is that focusing solely on Care/Harm and Fairness, and overlooking the value conservatives place on Loyalty, Authority, and Sanctity leads to misunderstanding and demonization.

2. Is the book's model of moral foundations scientifically proven?

  • Answer: It's a widely respected theory, but like any model, it has limitations.

    • Ongoing Research: His work has sparked extensive research supporting the general idea that moral judgments are grounded in intuition, and that people vary in how they weight these foundations.

    • Nuances: There's ongoing debate about whether those five foundations are exhaustive, or if there could be others. Still, it's a compelling framework for understanding our moral instincts.

3. If morality is about gut feelings, isn't reasoned debate pointless?

  • Answer: Reason still has a vital role. Haidt uses the elephant/rider metaphor:

    • Elephant: Our intuitions are like the powerful elephant, determining our initial stance.

    • Rider: Reason is the small rider ON the elephant. It can't MAKE the elephant go where it doesn't want, but it can guide, providing arguments to justify the elephant's feelings, or slowly persuade it in new directions.

    • Talking to Other Riders: Most productive to appeal to your opponent's rider with arguments their elephant can accept.

4. Hasn't this book just fueled more polarization by labeling people?

  • Answer: It can be misused that way. But Haidt's intention is the opposite:

    • Empathy: If I understand that someone deeply values loyalty, for example, I may disagree with their policy conclusions, but I stop seeing them as evil.

    • Common Ground: Maybe we both agree children deserve fairness, but my definition is strictly equal outcomes, theirs is more about making sure everyone has an opportunity. That's a starting point for nuanced debate.

5. Can this book help me change the minds of people I disagree with?

  • Answer: It'll make you a more effective communicator, but not a conversion machine.

    • Realistic Expectations: Deeply held beliefs are unlikely to shift in one conversation.

    • Respect is Key: People shut down if they feel judged. Showing genuine curiosity about their values, even if disagreeing, builds trust.

    • It's a Tool: This book helps you understand the WHY behind people's positions, which is the first step to finding persuasive arguments they're more likely to hear.

Part III:  Additional Books Of Interest

Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them by Joshua Greene:

  • Greene dives into the evolutionary and neuroscience-based roots of our moral instincts, exploring how they contribute to group conflict.

The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt: 

  • The authors build on Haidt's work from "The Righteous Mind" to examine the potential downsides of protecting young people from opposing viewpoints, and how it impacts their emotional well-being and societal resilience.

Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined by Steven Pinker: 

  • Pinker presents a data-driven historical analysis arguing that despite recent news trends, violence across societies has decreased overall. It offers an optimistic perspective on the potential for reducing conflict.

Talking to Strangers: What We Should Know About the People We Don't Know by Malcolm Gladwell: 

  • Gladwell explores how our misinterpretations of strangers can lead to misunderstandings and even dangerous outcomes. He promotes the importance of reexamining our assumptions and improving our ability to read people across lines of difference.

Heterodox Academy website:   

  • This organization promotes viewpoint diversity in academia and provides resources for those wanting to foster more open and constructive intellectual exchange.

Part IV:  Disclaimer

These results were largely generated by Google Gemini and updated with additional content by us on a case-by-case basis. To make this amount of complimentary content available at a cost-effective level for our site visitors and clients, we have to rely on, and use, resources like Google Gemini and other similar services.

bottom of page